Response to Posting re Dutchsinse on Janet Napolitano’s Blog

This is my response to a post on the Janet Napolitano forum where researcher Dutchsinse was defamed.  It was a shock that the moderator actually posted the rant from “anonymous”, but with the fear mongering by our government, I guess it was useful for them to post it.

 

“This “anonymous” character has been allowed to come into this site and slander a man with accusations that have no validity.  I would hope that the man that goes by the nick name of “Dutchsinse” will file a law suit against this person for defamation and bring him/her to justice.

Dutchsinse has never spoken about the government causing citizens to be killed.  He only shows what he has seen on Doppler radar that is available for all to see.  He has never warned anyone that the government is out to depopulate the U.S.  I have not heard Dutchsinse speak of FEMA camps, either.

I am surprised and appalled that a government site would allow this sort of response to be posted when it is not corroborated by any evidence.  It could not be corroborated, as these accusations are fabricated and never happened.

Then to allow the conclusions of this delusional person as if they have some sort of expert opinion seems to only add to the problems, both legal and otherwise, that they are causing.

I would think that Ms. Napolitano and the people that moderate this forum would think twice about allowing tax dollars to be spent in a manner that may be illegally damaging to the reputation of a man that attempts to bring information to others to help them.

In the law office that I managed there is at least one attorney that would represent this man in an actions against this person, but unfortunately he is not in the state which the attorney is licensed to practice.  If he were, we would take the case on a pro bono basis because after reviewing the situation, the attorney was angry at how this person has gone after Dutchsinse in such a voracious and unrelenting manner.

Thank you for your time.

Tom Peranteau”

 

In addition I wanted to post the comment policy from Napolitino’s website.  It becomes obvious that they are already breaking their own policy in order to allow the post about Dutch:

“Comment Policy

We welcome your comments on postings at the Department of Homeland Security Leadership Journal. Comments submitted to the Department of Homeland Security Journal will be reviewed before posting.

This is a moderated Journal, and the Department retains the discretion to determine which comments it will post and which it will not. We expect all contributors to be respectful. We will not post comments that contain personal attacks of any kind; refer to Federal Civil Service employees by name; contain offensive terms that target specific ethnic or racial groups, or vulgar language. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly off topic or that promote services or products.

We will make our best effort to promptly post those comments that are consistent with the Comment Policy, but given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur only during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. Comments submitted outside of business hours will be read and posted as quickly as possible. To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain on-topic. Department leadership will discuss other topics in the future.

What This Journal Is Not

Any opinions expressed here, except as specifically noted, are those of the individual authors or commenters and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Thank you for reviewing the Department of Homeland Security Leadership Journal comment policy.”

IronNet 480x60_1

  • http://twitter.com/irisphant iris

    Thank you Tom. No other reponses to this Janet Napolitano’s Sep 6th blog post have been approved and posted, many have tried several times.

    The post from 'Anonymous', which was approved by the DHS Blog site, is in violation of its own policy.

    • http://captaintom.coolblogsite.org TheEditor

      No big surprise. It's not in the government's best interest to post our responses.

  • http://twitter.com/irisphant iris

    Thank you Tom. No other reponses to this Janet Napolitano’s Sep 6th blog post have been approved and posted, many have tried several times.

    The post from ‘Anonymous’, which was approved by the DHS Blog site, is in violation of its own policy.

    • http://www.thedailydigest.org TheEditor

      No big surprise. It’s not in the government’s best interest to post our responses.

  • axel r

    Great effort… I can't believe someone anonymous can just write false things. A highly reputed website should investigate who wrote such a response. Here in Germany people around me can't believe it either.. Better get that fixed guys.
    Much love from Germany,Axel

    • http://captaintom.coolblogsite.org TheEditor

      I agree.  You would think that a government website run by the head of Homeland Security here, would have researched before they posted such tripe.  The only reason I could think of that they would have posted it, is so they can use it as fuel for their fear mongering.  They can then justify their position in spying on the citizens here.

      Don't let this happen in your country!

  • axel r

    Great effort… I can’t believe someone anonymous can just write false things. A highly reputed website should investigate who wrote such a response. Here in Germany people around me can’t believe it either.. Better get that fixed guys.
    Much love from Germany,Axel

    • http://www.thedailydigest.org TheEditor

      I agree.  You would think that a government website run by the head of Homeland Security here, would have researched before they posted such tripe.  The only reason I could think of that they would have posted it, is so they can use it as fuel for their fear mongering.  They can then justify their position in spying on the citizens here.

      Don’t let this happen in your country!

  • Liberty Truth4all

    Thank you for speaking out about this!  I am afraid this may be the beginning of innocent people being victimized by personal enemies in the DHS campaign  "if you see something say something".  Hopefully this wasn't the DHS's intention.  They need to retract and apologize for letting this happen.

  • Liberty Truth4all

    Thank you for speaking out about this!  I am afraid this may be the beginning of innocent people being victimized by personal enemies in the DHS campaign  “if you see something say something”.  Hopefully this wasn’t the DHS’s intention.  They need to retract and apologize for letting this happen.

  • Pingback: A Followup to the DHS Article re Dutchsinse | The Daily Digest